Training Philosophy Volitional Learning “Are you happy with your horse riding experience?” Preface Advanced Horsemanship Advanced Horsemanship 2 Advanced Horsemanship 3 Imitation verses Intelligence Reeducating Gestures verses Energy Creating a functional horse Reeducating a horse Less is Better Equine Anatomy verses Equine Anatomy A New Generation Of Riders False Practices False Practices 2 Sophisticated Equine Education Technical discussion with Leanne False practice 3 Wear and Tear oversimplifications Functional Anatomy Class-Sick The Miracles of the Science of Motion2 Xenophon 2014 The Science of Motion Work in Hand Gravity The rational for not touching the horses’ limbs Amazing Creatures Fundamental Difference The Heart of Science The Meaning of Life The Meaning Of Life part 2 The meaning of life PT3 Meaning of Life part 4 Meaning of life part 5 The Meaning of life 6 Quiet Legs The Root Cause The Source Meaning of life pt 7 Relaxation verses Decontraction The Tide Meaning of life pt 8 Mechano-responsiveness Mechano-responsiveness PT 3 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 4 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 5 Mechanoresponsiveness Pt 6 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 7 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 8 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 9 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 10 Mechanicalresponsiveness PT 11 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 12 Mechanoresponsiveness 13 Specialized Entheses Mechanoresponsiveness 14 Mechanoresponsiveness 15 Mechanoresponsiveness 16 Mechanoresponsiveness 17 Skipping Mechanoresponsiveness 18 Mechanoresposiveness 19 Mechanoresponsiveness 20 Mechno-responsiveness 21 Mechanoresponsiveness 22 Strategic-learning The Fake Line Mechnoresponsivenss 17 Simple Disobedience The Hen with the Golden Eggs Mechanoresponsiveness 23 Class Metronome Chocolate Mechno 24 Stamp Collecting Mechanoresponsivenes 25 Meaning of Life pt 9 Mechanoresponsiveness 26 Meaning of life 10

The meaning of life 10

Jean Luc Cornille

Quolibet and Jean Luc Cornille during show jumping course at Punchestown 1970

“To know that we know what we know, and to know that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.”  (Nicolaus Copernicus)

Returning from a successful achievement at the 1970 World Championship of Punchestown, everyone at the French Olympic Center of Fontainebleau was smiling; my Horse Quolibet performed better than all expectations and everyone was very supportive except one man. social media did not exist at this time but the man came up with a typical social media nasty comment. “So, now you can start to learn how to ride.” However, at the contrary of the social media “keyboard riders;” who can’t ride, can’t train, can’t teach but fantasize on their keyboard about a talent that they don’t have criticizing everybody else, the man was a good rider. Years earlier, he competed with the French Three Day Event Olympic Team at the Mexico Olympics. 

I respected the man because he was the type of rider who worked hard for his achievements. I asked him to further his thoughts. “You did well because you took more risks than the others and your horse kept you alive.” I told him “I agree; but that is what we all do; what is your point?” He cited Copernicus adding that success in the show ring, even at the World Championship, does not necessary mean knowledge. We both came from the same classical school but we followed two different paths; he was erudite in equestrian literature and I was interested in equine science. In his mind knowledge was the classical literature. In my mind knowledge was equine biomechanics. In the early seventies, equine science was in its infancy but there were already pertinent discoveries questioning previous beliefs. He preached absolute devotion to classical authors. With my background as a gymnast, I have experienced in my own body, the pain and suffering of not having a physique properly coordinated for the athletic demand of the performances. In counterpart, I have also experienced ease and effortlessness executing movements for which my physique was properly coordinated.

The remark of a pro golfer crossed my mind, “Practice makes permanent”. Learning the wrong coordination handicaps both human and equine athletes permanently. Knowledge evolve and with knowledge, the capacity to efficiently coordinate the horse physique for the athletic demand of the performance. By applying finding of pertinent research studies, Quolibet raised from being a school horse to a successful world class champion. He was a school horse because his mind and body revolted against the rigid principles of conventional thinking. Instead of tailoring classical views to the horse’s needs, the horse was judged in respect of traditional thinking and downgraded to the difficult life of a school horse. He became a world class champion because I looked out of the box and the man took umbrage because I had the pertinence to look out of the box. This was forty-seven years ago and, while social media keyboard riders have not evolve one inch, actual knowledge of equine biomechanics has made considerable progresses.

The main source of our equestrian discord was the belief that lowering the neck and engaging the hind legs, shortening the lower line, would flex the upper line. The “bow and string” concept has been created decades earlier, in 1946 by the Dutch scientist. E. J. Slijper. “The horse has a very flat shaped bow which is made up of the vertebral column, its epaxial muscles and ligaments. The whole structure is kept rigid and under tension from the string formed by the sternum, abdominal muscles, linea alba and the muscles of the limbs.” (E. J. Slijper, 1946) My opponent believed that the “core” was responsible for all vertebral column movements. I questioned the thought because it did not fit the very large diversity of complex and minuscule movements that the horse back executed during locomotion and performance. The very large diversity, complexity and precision of the back movements was better explained by Richard Tucker’s dynamic study. “An initial thrust on the column is translated into a series of predominantly vertical and horizontal forces which diminish progressively as they pass from one vertebrae to the next”. (Richard Tucker-1964). The thought that the back muscles were capable of converting the thrust generated by the hind legs into upward forces, balance control, horizontal forces, forward movements and other forces involved in lateral bending and inverted rotation, was more in line with the feeling given by the horse back during work and performance.

The cross country course of the Mexico Olympics was altered by an enormous storm that let the ground saturated with water. The flooding running through the water jump was so deep and so intense that a few horses had to be rescued from drowning. The man had the bad luck of completing the course after the storm. He described the incredible contortions of his horse’s back trying to climb the bank out of the water with a footing so slippery that even with studs on the shoes, the front legs were unable to have any grip. I commented, “It does not make sense that large muscles situated below the sternum and muscles such as the rectus abdominis, which have a relatively simple structure, could create such complex throracolumbar column movements. While pectoral and abdominal muscles are likely involved in thoracolumbar spine flexion, bending and extension, the thought that epaxial and hypaxial muscles of the thoracolumbar column are the ones creating vertebral column movements is more in line with what we can feel and observe preparing horses for athletic performances.”  As the man remained silent. I reminded him that the cranial thoracic vertebrae have twelve articular surfaces. The vertebrae are constructed this way because a large diversity of minuscule movements take place and it is more likely that these microscopic movements are orchestrated by muscles inserted on and around the vertebrae than massive pectoral muscles situate below and around the sternum. The man mind was spinning for an answer but he was cornered and pulled out the classical umbrella; “Thousand years of tradition cannot be wrong.” I was ready to oppose that thousand years of tradition have defended the thought that the earth was flat, but in the seventies as well as today, members of the flat earth society were, and still are, unable to evolve.

However, one week later, the man came back saying, “I did not know that you were doing some research. What you told me about the back muscles turned in my mind and it fit what I have always felt.” The man was truly a horse person. His anger against high competition was not directed against me but against the incapacity of the training techniques to fully prepare the horses for the athletic demand of modern performances. He was frustrated because the equestrian literature does not provide solutions. He was hostile at first because I was, in his mind, another rider ready to take risk and challenging the horse beyond the horse athletic capacities. He was judging what I was doing from the limits of his world. Paraphrasing James Rooney, the man view was restricted by his teleological thinking. “The waspish ghost of teleological thinking constantly cloud the picture.” (James Rooney, Biomechanics of lameness in horses, 1976)

Exploring the thought that back muscles have the capacity to convert the trust generated by the hind legs into horizontal forces, upward forces, and other movements such as lateral bending and associated rotation, implied upgrading riding and training principles to the way the back muscles are designed to function.  Classic authors promoted shifting the rider’s weight, “Undoubtedly any shift of the rider’s weight is important for balancing the horse for controlled movements.” (Estienne Saurel. !964. Pratique de l’équitation  d’après les maitres français. Flammarion, Paris) The same year, Richard Tucker explained that the main back muscles were set and working in opposite direction. In the light of Tucker’s explanation, any shift of the rider weight can only alter the horse ability to properly coordinate the back muscles. The first aim was finding the way to sustain a neutral balance; a balance over the seat bones where the body weight would not be acting front to back or back to front. The problem is that every week end I was in the show ring and judges give a score in respect to what they believe and not what new scientific findings suggest.

“There is another world, but it is in this one.” (William Butler Yeats) I was gradually using my body differently but the look was about the same. I was exploring another world but it looked like this one. Some judges could not see beyond their teleological thinking scoring me down on the rider’s position because I was not on my gluts leaning backward. Better judges regarded the harmony with the horses liking the suspension and cadence. One judge, who had a great sense of humor, loved the horse’s gaits so much that he gave me 11 on the rider position. Normally, the score is from 0 to 10.

Updating riding techniques to actual understanding of equine thoracolumbar spine biomechanics, it is possible to achieve subtle orchestration of the work of the back muscles and consequently improve or modify limbs kinematics. Poor mover became good movers and good movers became great movers.  The same technique allows correcting limbs kinematics abnormalities causing injury. James Rooney’s “Biomechanics of lameness in horses” can now became the biomechanics of soundness. The missing link was the capacity to correct the limb kinematics abnormality. Both, conventional and veterinary thinking regarded back problem as a consequence of hocks or other limbs issues. The thought that back kinematics were controlled by abdominal and pectoral muscles only permitted an approximative coordination of the back muscles. The capacity to correct limbs kinematics abnormalities through sophisticated coordination of the thoracolumbar column was not possible.

We name the approach Motion Microscope Therapy because the therapy is done entirely in motion. The therapy is about identifying and correcting the source of aberrant limb kinematics causing injury. The root cause is in most instance in thoracolumbar column dysfunction and correcting the dysfunction demands the sophisticated education and coordination of numerous but microscopic movements. Proper motion demands looking at the horse locomotion under the eye of a microscope. Jean Luc Cornille