Training Philosophy Volitional Learning “Are you happy with your horse riding experience?” Preface Advanced Horsemanship Advanced Horsemanship 2 Advanced Horsemanship 3 Imitation verses Intelligence Reeducating Gestures verses Energy Creating a functional horse Reeducating a horse Less is Better Equine Anatomy verses Equine Anatomy A New Generation Of Riders False Practices False Practices 2 Sophisticated Equine Education Technical discussion with Leanne False practice 3 Wear and Tear oversimplifications Functional Anatomy Class-Sick The Miracles of the Science of Motion2 Xenophon 2014 The Science of Motion Work in Hand Gravity The rational for not touching the horses’ limbs Amazing Creatures Fundamental Difference The Heart of Science The Meaning of Life The Meaning Of Life part 2 The meaning of life PT3 Meaning of Life part 4 Meaning of life part 5 The Meaning of life 6 Quiet Legs The Root Cause The Source Meaning of life pt 7 Relaxation verses Decontraction The Tide Meaning of life pt 8 Mechano-responsiveness Mechano-responsiveness PT 3 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 4 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 5 Mechanoresponsiveness Pt 6 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 7 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 8 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 9 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 10 Mechanicalresponsiveness PT 11 Mechanoresponsiveness PT 12 Mechanoresponsiveness 13 Specialized Entheses Mechanoresponsiveness 14 Mechanoresponsiveness 15 Mechanoresponsiveness 16 Mechanoresponsiveness 17 Skipping Mechanoresponsiveness 18 Mechanoresposiveness 19 Mechanoresponsiveness 20 Mechno-responsiveness 21 Mechanoresponsiveness 22 Strategic-learning The Fake Line Mechnoresponsivenss 17 Simple Disobedience The Hen with the Golden Eggs Mechanoresponsiveness 23 Class Metronome Chocolate Mechno 24 Stamp Collecting Mechanoresponsivenes 25 Meaning of Life pt 9 Mechanoresponsiveness 26 Meaning of life 10

Specialized Entheses

Linus Paulin defines the process of scientific research as “factual documentation of test hypothesis.” The factual documentation might be complex, difficult and costly. A less scrupulous form of “science”, has resolved the problem, skipping the factual documentation and furthering the assumption. Considering the nature of human nature, the science of assumption banks on the belief that if repeated long and loud enough, an assumption will soon be perceived as reality. The sacroiliac joint is like two completely different joint view from the science of assumption and the factual documentation of test hypothesis. The science of assumption pretends that the joint moves. No explanation is never offered; just statements. True science based on factual documentation view the sacroiliac joint form a totally different perspective. The structure and very strong stabilization mechanism suggest that even if named a joint, the SIJ is more like a specialized Entheses designed to transport considerable forces from the pelvis and therefore the hind legs, to the sacrum, and therefore the thoracolumbar spine.

Some wonder why there is still a joint there since it does not move, but thinking forces, it became logical that fibrocatilages having some flexibility, are more apt at transporting forces acting in different directions. If nature had, over centuries, fused the sacroiliac joint it would be a bone and a bone can only transport force in one direction. The specific structure of the joint where two different fibrocartilages are covering the sacral part and the ilium part aim toward the thought that this specific structure is constructed to transport, from the pelvis to the sacrum, forces acting in different directions.

The hypothesis is attractive as it explains why two different fibrocartilages covers the two faces of the joint. If proven by further studies, the theory would avoid the misinterpretation related to the term joint. Because a joint is designed to move, the term joint suggest movement. Specialized Entheses is a better definition as it is a structure transporting forces without movement.  Jean Luc Cornille